What Is the Index of a Subgroup in a Finite Group?
At a glance
- 1. Identify the subgroup
The index is defined relative to a subgroup H of a group G, not for G alone.
- 2. Count cosets
Compute the number of distinct left or right cosets of H in G.
- 3. Use Lagrange’s formula
For finite G, divide the order of G by the order of H.
- 4. Check the result
The index must be a positive integer and divide the group order.
The phrase “index of a finite group” is incomplete unless a subgroup is specified. In group theory, the index usually means the index of a subgroup in a group , written
It measures how many distinct copies of —more precisely, cosets of —fit inside . When is finite, the index is especially easy to calculate:
Here and denote the numbers of elements in the groups.
Definition of subgroup index
Let be a subgroup of . A left coset of is a set of the form
where . The left cosets partition : every element of belongs to exactly one left coset. The index of in is the number of distinct left cosets:
You can equivalently count right cosets, sets of the form . The numbers of left and right cosets are always equal, even when is not abelian.
If is finite, every coset has exactly elements. Since the cosets partition the elements of ,
and therefore
This is the index form of Lagrange’s theorem.
Fully worked example: a subgroup of
The symmetric group consists of all permutations of three objects, so
Consider the subgroup
where is the identity permutation. Its order is .
The index is
There are indeed three distinct left cosets. They can be represented by
Each coset contains two elements, and the three cosets together contain all six elements of . Thus the index is .
For comparison, the alternating subgroup has order , so
In this case, the two cosets are itself and one coset containing the odd permutations.
Special cases
Several indices occur frequently:
| Subgroup | Index in a finite group |
|---|---|
| $[G:{e}]= | |
| $ | H |
| has order | $[G:H]= |
The index is always a positive integer. Consequently, the order of a subgroup must divide the order of the finite group:
This is the usual statement of Lagrange’s theorem. Conversely, not every divisor of must occur as the order of a subgroup; the divisibility condition is necessary, not sufficient.
How to calculate an index directly
If you know the orders of the groups, use this procedure:
- Verify that .
- Find and .
- Divide by .
- Interpret the quotient as the number of cosets.
For example, suppose is a finite group of order and is a subgroup of order . Then
So has four left cosets and four right cosets in . Each coset has six elements, and the four cosets contain all elements of without overlap.
If instead and , such an cannot exist, because
is not an integer. This detects a contradiction with Lagrange’s theorem.
Relation to normal subgroups and quotient groups
The index is defined whether or not is normal. However, if is normal in , the set of cosets forms a quotient group . In that case,
For example, is normal in , and
If is not normal, the cosets still exist and the index is still defined, but the collection of cosets does not generally have a group structure.
A subgroup of index is always normal. Indeed, there are only two cosets: and the one remaining coset. The left and right coset partitions must therefore coincide. This makes index- subgroups especially useful.
Common mistakes
Treating “the index of ” as a standalone quantity
There is no single index attached to a finite group without reference to a subgroup. The notation must specify both groups, such as .
Dividing in the wrong direction
The formula is
not . The index counts how many -sized cosets make up , so it cannot be smaller than .
Confusing index with subgroup order
The order counts elements inside . The index counts cosets of in . They are different quantities, although they satisfy
Assuming normality is required
Normality is not needed to define an index. It is needed only if you want the cosets to form a quotient group.
For an infinite group, the same definition applies, but the numerical formula involving finite cardinal division may not be useful. For finite groups, however, the answer is simply the order of the group divided by the order of the subgroup.
References
- Abstract Algebra, David S. Dummit and Richard M. Foote
- Contemporary Abstract Algebra, Joseph A. Gallian
Spotted an error? Send a correction. Read how we write and check articles in our editorial policy.