How to Prove That √2 Is the Supremum of {x ∈ ℝ : x² < 2}
At a glance
- 1. Show it bounds the set
If x² < 2, then |x| < √2, so every element is below √2.
- 2. Test smaller bounds
For any b < √2, find an element of the set that is greater than b.
- 3. Conclude leastness
Since no smaller number is an upper bound, √2 is the supremum.
Let
To prove that is the supremum of , you must show two things: is an upper bound, and no smaller number is an upper bound. This second part is what establishes that the bound is the least one.
1. Show that √2 is an upper bound
If , then . Equivalently, , so in particular . Therefore every element of is less than , and is an upper bound.
In fact, the inequality also gives . Thus . The endpoints are not included because their squares equal , not a number strictly less than .
2. Show that no smaller number is an upper bound
Take any real number . We will find an element of that is greater than .
- If , choose . Then , so , and .
- If , choose the midpoint between and :
Since , this midpoint satisfies . It is positive, so . Hence and .
In either case, every number below fails to be an upper bound for . This proves that
A concrete check
For example, take a proposed upper bound . Since , the midpoint construction gives
This number is greater than but less than , so . Thus is not an upper bound. The same construction works for every nonnegative , not just for this example.
Why the supremum is not a maximum
A maximum must be an element of the set. But , because , and the defining condition is the strict inequality . So has no maximum even though its supremum is . The supremum can be approached as closely as desired by elements of , without belonging to the set.
Common mistakes
- Checking only that is an upper bound. An upper bound need not be the least upper bound; you must also rule out every smaller upper bound.
- Claiming that the endpoint is in the set. The strict inequality excludes both and .
- Ignoring negative proposed bounds. The midpoint argument above is intended for . For , the simpler witness works.
- Treating as without considering negative values. The full equivalent condition is . The upper-bound argument uses only its right-hand side, but the two-sided interval describes the whole set.
Spotted an error? Send a correction. Read how we write and check articles in our editorial policy.