What Is the Difference Between Supremum and Maximum?
At a glance
- 1. Check upper bounds
An upper bound is any number at least as large as every element of the set.
- 2. Find the least bound
The supremum is the smallest upper bound; it may or may not belong to the set.
- 3. Check membership
A maximum must belong to the set and be at least as large as every other element.
- 4. Compare the two
If a nonempty set has a maximum, that element is also its supremum.
The difference is about whether the bound must be an element of the set. A supremum is the least number that is at least as large as every element; a maximum is an element of the set that is at least as large as every other element.
Thus, a maximum is always a supremum, but a supremum need not be a maximum. The distinction matters especially when a set approaches a boundary that it does not include.
Definitions
Let be a nonempty subset of the real numbers that is bounded above. A number is an upper bound for if for every . The supremum, written , is the least of all upper bounds. Equivalently, it satisfies two conditions:
- for every .
- If is any upper bound for , then .
A number is the maximum of , written , if and for every . The membership requirement is the key difference.
In , every nonempty set that is bounded above has a supremum, by the completeness property of the real numbers. It does not necessarily have a maximum.
When the maximum exists
If , then is an upper bound for . It is also the least upper bound: any upper bound must be at least as large as the element itself. Therefore,
whenever has a maximum.
The converse does not always hold. A supremum can be a boundary value that the set gets arbitrarily close to but never reaches. If the supremum belongs to the set, however, it is the maximum: implies .
Worked examples
An open interval
Take , the set of real numbers strictly between 0 and 1. Every element of is less than 1, so 1 is an upper bound. No smaller number is an upper bound: if , there is an element of greater than . Thus,
But , so there is no maximum. In particular, 0.999 is not a maximum: there are elements of the interval larger than 0.999.
A closed interval
For , the endpoint 1 belongs to the set and is at least as large as every element. Therefore,
The only change from the previous example is that the endpoint is included.
A sequence of reciprocals
Let . Its elements begin . The largest element is 1, which belongs to the set. Hence,
By contrast, if the set starts at , then has maximum and supremum both equal to . The sequences tend to 0, but 0 is neither the supremum nor the maximum of either set; their maxima are the first terms, 1 and .
A practical test for a maximum
For a nonempty, bounded-above set , first find or identify . Then check whether :
- If , then .
- If , then has no maximum.
For example, for , the supremum is 1 but 1 is excluded, so no maximum exists. For , the supremum is again 1 and is included, so it is the maximum.
Common mistakes
- Treating any upper bound as the supremum. For , 2 is an upper bound, but it is not the least upper bound; the supremum is 1.
- Assuming a supremum must be in the set. The definition requires it to be the least upper bound, not a member. The set is a standard counterexample.
- Calling an excluded endpoint a maximum. A maximum must be an element of the set. If the interval is open at its upper endpoint, that endpoint cannot be the maximum.
- Assuming every set has a finite supremum or a maximum. A set that is unbounded above, such as the positive integers, has no finite real supremum and no maximum. The empty set also has no maximum; its supremum depends on the convention being used, so the definitions above assume a nonempty set.
When you compare the terms, ask two questions: is the number an upper bound, and does it belong to the set? The least upper bound answers the first question and the maximum must answer both.
References
- Walter Rudin, Principles of Mathematical Analysis
Spotted an error? Send a correction. Read how we write and check articles in our editorial policy.