Find the Supremum, Infimum, lim sup, and lim inf of 2 − 1/n
At a glance
- 1. Fix the index
Take n to be a positive integer, so the sequence begins at n = 1.
- 2. Check the bounds
The terms are at least 1 and strictly less than 2.
- 3. Identify the extrema
The first term is 1; the terms approach 2 without reaching it.
- 4. Find the tail limits
The tail infima and tail suprema both tend to 2.
Assume ranges over the positive integers, so the sequence starts at . The first terms are . They increase toward , but none equals .
Therefore, the range has infimum and supremum . The infimum is attained as the minimum; the supremum is not attained, so there is no maximum. The sequence converges to , which means its limit superior and limit inferior are both .
Find the infimum and supremum
For every positive integer , we have and . Subtracting from gives
The lower bound is attained at , since . Thus is the minimum of the sequence values and, consequently, their infimum:
The same inequality shows that is an upper bound. To see that it is the least upper bound, take any . Choose a positive integer . Then
So terms get arbitrarily close to from below. No number smaller than can be an upper bound, and therefore
Since for every , this supremum is not attained: the sequence has no maximum.
Compute lim sup and lim inf
The limit superior and limit inferior describe the limiting behavior of the tails of a sequence. For a bounded sequence, they are defined by
Here the sequence is increasing, since
Consequently, in the tail beginning at , the smallest term is , and the tail supremum is . The latter is a supremum, not a maximum: all terms in every tail remain strictly below . Hence
As tends to infinity, tends to , while the tail suprema are already equal to . Thus
This also follows from the usual limit: . Whenever a sequence converges to a finite limit, its lim inf and lim sup equal that limit.
A finite-term check
The first five terms are
For these five terms alone, the minimum is and the maximum is . For the whole infinite sequence, however, terms continue beyond and approach . This illustrates why the maximum of a finite initial segment is not necessarily the supremum of the complete sequence.
Common mistakes
- Calling the maximum: A maximum must be a term of the sequence. Here for every finite positive , so is only the supremum.
- Confusing the first term with the limit: The first term is ; the terms approach . The infimum of the range is not the sequence’s limit.
- Using only the limit to find the infimum: Knowing the limit is does not by itself identify the infimum. Check all terms; here they are at least , and .
- Ignoring the indexing convention: Some texts use for positive integers, while others include zero. Since is undefined at , this sequence must be indexed by positive integers.
| Quantity | Value | Attained? |
|---|---|---|
| Infimum | Yes; it is the minimum at | |
| Supremum | No; it is not a term | |
| Limit inferior | Not an extremum of the original range | |
| Limit superior | Not an extremum of the original range |
Spotted an error? Send a correction. Read how we write and check articles in our editorial policy.