Why Do $xy$ and $yx$ Have the Same Order in a Group?
At a glance
- 1. Find a conjugation
Compute x⁻¹(xy)x and simplify it to yx.
- 2. Compare powers
Conjugation carries every power of xy to the corresponding power of yx.
- 3. Compare orders
The same positive exponents give the identity for both elements, so their orders match.
For any elements in a group , the products and have the same order. The key is that they are conjugate: one is obtained from the other by conjugating with a group element. This proof does not require to be finite or commutative.
The proof
Recall that the order of an element is the least positive integer for which , if such an integer exists. If no positive power of equals the identity, has infinite order.
Conjugate by :
So is a conjugate of . More explicitly, for every positive integer ,
The middle factors cancel when the product is expanded. Consequently,
The last equivalence follows by multiplying by on the left and on the right. Thus and have exactly the same positive powers that equal the identity. If there is a least such exponent, it is the same for both elements; if there is none, both have infinite order. Therefore,
A worked example in
Take , the group of permutations of , and let and . Use the standard convention that permutations are composed right to left. Then
These are different permutations, but each is a 3-cycle, so each has order 3. The conjugation calculation explains why their orders agree: here, and . The general result says more than this example: the products need not be equal, but their orders always agree.
Why conjugation preserves order
More generally, for any , the elements and have the same order. For every positive integer ,
Hence exactly when . This is why conjugation preserves both finite order and infinite order. In the question, take and .
You can also verify the conjugacy in the other direction: . Either identity identifies the same pair as conjugate elements.
Common mistakes
- Assuming . That equality is true in an abelian group, but not generally. The claim concerns the orders, not the elements themselves.
- Trying to reorder the factors. You do not need commutativity. The cancellation in uses associativity and the inverse law only.
- Using only finite-order reasoning. If the order is infinite, compare the identity powers instead: the equivalence if and only if holds for every positive integer .
- Claiming the converse for arbitrary pairs. This argument shows that and are conjugate, so they have the same order. Having the same order alone does not generally imply that two elements are conjugate.
The same reasoning is useful whenever a problem replaces an element by a conjugate: properties determined by its powers, such as its order, are unchanged.
References
- Abstract Algebra, David S. Dummit and Richard M. Foote
Spotted an error? Send a correction. Read how we write and check articles in our editorial policy.