Why Does (a * b)^n = a^n * b^n in an Abelian Group?
At a glance
- 1. Define powers
Let e be the identity; use repeated products for positive powers, e for the zeroth power, and inverses for negative powers.
- 2. Use commutativity
Because the group is abelian, a and b, and their powers, can be reordered.
- 3. Induct on positive n
Assume the formula for n, expand one more factor, and move a past b to complete the induction step.
- 4. Handle zero and negatives
The zero case is the identity; for negative exponents, apply the positive case to the inverses.
In a group, powers are formed by repeatedly applying the group operation. The identity
holds in every abelian group because its operation is commutative. The proof for positive exponents is an induction; the zero and negative cases follow from the definitions of group powers and inverses.
What the notation means
Write for the identity element of . For an element , define , define for positive as repeated copies of , and define for positive .
The operation is written as here, so means the group product; it need not be ordinary multiplication. The theorem applies to every integer . If your course uses “natural number” to mean only positive integers, the induction below proves that version directly.
Proof for positive exponents
For , the claim is just . Suppose it holds for a positive integer , so that . Then
The key reordering is . Since is abelian, every pair of elements commutes, including and . This proves the identity for all positive integers by induction.
For , both sides are : and .
For , write where . In an abelian group, . Apply the positive-exponent result to and :
Thus the formula holds for every integer exponent.
Worked example
Consider the nonzero rational numbers under ordinary multiplication. This is an abelian group. Choose , , and . The two sides agree:
The induction proof explains why this works: when the repeated factors are expanded, commutativity lets you collect all four copies of and all four copies of separately.
Why commutativity matters
The claim is not true for arbitrary groups. For example, in the permutation group , use composition from right to left and let and . Then , so . But , and . Therefore the formula fails for in this nonabelian group.
This also shows why an induction argument cannot simply reorder factors in a general group: need not equal .
Common mistakes
- Assuming the identity holds in every group. It relies on commutativity. Without that condition, the factors in the expanded product may not be regrouped as .
- Ignoring the exponent convention. State whether is positive or any integer. The theorem is valid for all integers when powers are defined using the identity and inverses.
- Reordering without justification. In the induction step, explicitly use that commutes with ; this is guaranteed because the group is abelian.
- Confusing group powers with scalar powers. The notation means repeated use of the group operation. In additive notation, the corresponding statement is .
Spotted an error? Send a correction. Read how we write and check articles in our editorial policy.