Ma · Mathematics

Why Is the Derivative of an Antiderivative Equal to the Original Function?

Published By the 9to5Science editorial team

At a glance

  1. 1. Separate the claims

    An antiderivative is defined by its derivative; the Fundamental Theorem proves the same result for a function defined by an integral.

  2. 2. Assume continuity

    For the integral proof, suppose f is continuous near the point x.

  3. 3. Form the difference quotient

    Write the change in the integral from x to x+h, then divide by h.

  4. 4. Take the limit

    Continuity makes the average value of f over the shrinking interval approach f(x).

The statement that the derivative of an antiderivative equals the original function has two closely related meanings. If FF is already specified to be an antiderivative of ff, the statement is the definition of “antiderivative.” The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus gives a substantive result: it shows that integrating a continuous function from a fixed starting point produces a function whose derivative is the original function.

What “antiderivative” means

A function FF is an antiderivative, or primitive, of ff on an interval if

F′(x)=f(x)F'(x)=f(x)

at every point in that interval where the derivative is considered. So there is no separate proof that an antiderivative has derivative ff; that property is what makes it an antiderivative.

For instance, F(x)=x3/3F(x)=x^3/3 is an antiderivative of f(x)=x2f(x)=x^2 because differentiating gives F′(x)=x2F'(x)=x^2. Every function x3/3+Cx^3/3+C, where CC is constant, is also an antiderivative, since the derivative of a constant is zero.

The deeper question is why an integral-defined function has this property.

Fundamental Theorem of Calculus: derivative of an integral

Suppose ff is continuous on an interval II containing aa, and define

F(x)=∫axf(t) dtF(x)=\int_a^x f(t)\,dt

for x∈Ix\in I. Then the first part of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus states that FF is differentiable at every interior point xx of II and

F′(x)=f(x).F'(x)=f(x).

At an endpoint of II, the corresponding one-sided derivative satisfies the same formula. The continuity assumption is a convenient standard condition that guarantees the result at every interior point of the interval. It can be weakened, but continuity is the usual introductory-calculus version.

Proof from the difference quotient

Fix an interior point xx and take a nonzero increment hh small enough that x+hx+h is in the interval. By the definition of FF,

F(x+h)−F(x)h=1h(∫ax+hf(t) dt−∫axf(t) dt)=1h∫xx+hf(t) dt.\begin{aligned} \frac{F(x+h)-F(x)}{h} &=\frac{1}{h}\left(\int_a^{x+h} f(t)\,dt-\int_a^x f(t)\,dt\right)\\ &=\frac{1}{h}\int_x^{x+h} f(t)\,dt. \end{aligned}

This quotient is the average value of ff over the short interval from xx to x+hx+h (with the usual signed-integral convention if h<0h<0). As hh approaches zero, continuity means that values of f(t)f(t) on this interval get arbitrarily close to f(x)f(x). Therefore their average gets close to f(x)f(x) as well. In the limit,

F′(x)=lim⁡h→0F(x+h)−F(x)h=f(x).F'(x)=\lim_{h\to 0}\frac{F(x+h)-F(x)}{h}=f(x).

A precise estimate makes the argument explicit. Subtract f(x)f(x) from the quotient:

∣1h∫xx+hf(t) dt−f(x)∣≤sup⁡t between x and x+h∣f(t)−f(x)∣.\left|\frac{1}{h}\int_x^{x+h}f(t)\,dt-f(x)\right| \leq \sup_{t\text{ between }x\text{ and }x+h}|f(t)-f(x)|.

By continuity at xx, the right-hand side tends to zero as h→0h\to0. That proves the derivative formula. At an endpoint of II, the same estimate applies with hh restricted to increments that stay in II, proving the corresponding one-sided derivative formula.

Worked example

Let f(t)=t2f(t)=t^2 and define F(x)=∫1xt2 dtF(x)=\int_1^x t^2\,dt. Evaluating the integral gives

F(x)=x3−13.F(x)=\frac{x^3-1}{3}.

Differentiate this expression:

F′(x)=13(3x2)=x2=f(x).F'(x)=\frac{1}{3}(3x^2)=x^2=f(x).

The theorem also gives the derivative directly, without first evaluating the integral: since the integrand t2t^2 is continuous, F′(x)=x2F'(x)=x^2.

Common mistakes and variations

  • Confusing the definition with the theorem: “FF is an antiderivative of ff” already asserts F′=fF'=f. The theorem explains why a particular integral-defined function is an antiderivative.
  • Dropping the continuity condition: For a continuous ff, the derivative formula holds throughout the interval’s interior, with the corresponding one-sided formula at endpoints. With less regular functions, the integral-defined function need not have the stated derivative at every point.
  • Mixing up the variable of integration: In ∫axf(t) dt\int_a^x f(t)\,dt, tt is a dummy variable and xx is the endpoint. The result is a function of xx.
  • Forgetting the constant: If F′=fF'=f, then F+CF+C has the same derivative. An indefinite integral, ∫f(x) dx\int f(x)\,dx, represents a family of antiderivatives, not just one function.

A related part of the Fundamental Theorem connects definite integrals to any antiderivative: if FF is continuous on [a,b][a,b], differentiable on (a,b)(a,b), and F′(x)=f(x)F'(x)=f(x) there, with ff Riemann integrable on [a,b][a,b], then ∫abf(x) dx=F(b)−F(a)\int_a^b f(x)\,dx=F(b)-F(a). This is often called the evaluation part of the theorem.

References

  1. Calculus, Volume 1 — Gilbert Strang and Edwin “Jed” Herman

Spotted an error? Send a correction. Read how we write and check articles in our editorial policy.