What Is the nth Derivative of (ax + b)^(-m)?
At a glance
- 1. Differentiate once
Apply the chain rule to the power of the linear expression.
- 2. Spot the pattern
Each derivative adds a factor and raises the denominator's exponent by one.
- 3. Apply the formula
Use the rising product m(m + 1) through (m + n − 1), along with the chain-rule factor a^n.
For constants , , and , the expression combines a power rule with the chain rule. Each differentiation contributes another factor of , changes the sign, and increases the magnitude of the exponent in the denominator.
For a positive integer and a nonnegative integer , the formula is
The product has factors. When , it is an empty product, defined to be , so the formula gives the original function.
Why the formula works
Start with the ordinary power rule and chain rule:
Differentiate once more. The exponent is now , so another application of the chain rule gives
A third derivative introduces the next factor, , and another negative sign:
After derivatives, the sign is , the chain rule has supplied , and the factors from differentiating the power are through . This gives the stated result.
You can also justify the pattern by induction: differentiating the formula for the th derivative multiplies it by and decreases the exponent by one. That produces exactly the formula with replaced by .
Worked example
Find the third derivative of
Here , , and . Substitute into the formula:
Thus, equivalently,
The domain excludes , where the original function is undefined. For , the first derivative is negative, the second positive, and the third negative; the coefficient signs alternate with the order of differentiation.
A compact notation for the coefficient
The rising factorial is defined by
with . Using it, the formula becomes
For positive real , the product can also be written with the gamma function as . The product form is usually simplest when is a whole number.
Common mistakes
- Forgetting the chain-rule factor. Differentiating with respect to contributes a factor of each time, so the th derivative has , not just .
- Using the wrong product. The coefficient is , not and not the descending product .
- Missing the alternating coefficient sign. The coefficient contains : it is negative for odd and positive for even , though the sign of the full derivative can also depend on .
- Miscounting the exponent. It becomes after derivatives.
- Ignoring where the function is defined. If and is a positive integer, exclude the point where . If is a general real number, the real-valued power may require , depending on ; use a domain on which the original function is defined.
Special cases
If and , the expression is constant in , so every derivative of positive order is zero. The general formula also gives zero for because it contains . If and , the expression is undefined for positive .
If is a positive integer, the formula applies directly wherever . For other real values of , the same differentiation pattern holds on any interval where is a well-defined real-valued function. The algebraic formula does not remove the need to check that domain.
References
- James Stewart, Calculus: Early Transcendentals
Spotted an error? Send a correction. Read how we write and check articles in our editorial policy.