How to Find the Inverse Laplace Transform of 1/[s²(s² + ω²)]
At a glance
- 1. Split the fraction
Rewrite the denominator as a sum of two standard Laplace-transform terms.
- 2. Match transform pairs
Use the inverse transforms of 1/s² and 1/(s² + ω²).
- 3. Combine the results
Keep track of the factor of ω and state that ω is nonzero.
- 4. Check the result
Transform the answer back, or compare its behavior near t = 0.
For the usual Laplace-transform convention with time variable , the inverse transform can be found directly by partial fractions. The apparent difficulty is that the denominator contains both a repeated factor, , and a quadratic factor, .
Assume first that . The result is
The case must be handled separately: then the transform is , whose inverse is .
Partial fractions
Set the rational function equal to a sum of terms with the same denominator factors:
Multiplying through by gives
Matching the constant term and the coefficient of gives and . Therefore and , so
This decomposition is valid when . It is already arranged in terms of standard Laplace-transform pairs.
Apply the transform pairs
The relevant pairs are
Using linearity and retaining the factor gives
The extra factor of in the sine term comes from its transform pair. It is easy to miss when applying the pair to .
Worked example:
Substitute for in the decomposition and inverse-transform each term:
To check, transform the two time-domain terms separately. The transform of is , and the transform of is . Their difference is
as required.
An independent check using convolution
The original expression is a product of and . Their inverse transforms are and , respectively. The product rule for Laplace transforms says that the inverse of the product is their convolution:
Evaluating the integral gives , agreeing with the partial-fraction result. This provides another route if you are studying the convolution theorem, though partial fractions are shorter here.
The special case
When , do not substitute into the partial-fraction coefficients: they contain division by . Instead simplify the original expression first:
This is also the limit of the nonzero- answer. Expanding the sine near zero gives , so the leading terms cancel and the expression approaches .
Common mistakes
- Omitting the sine-pair factor: transforms to , not just .
- Using the wrong sign: the coefficient of is negative. The decomposition must reproduce the original fraction when recombined.
- Applying the formula at without a limit: the displayed coefficients are undefined there, even though the original transform has a well-defined value.
- Confusing with in the sine argument: the standard pair uses in the denominator and in time.
References
- M. R. Spiegel, Laplace Transforms, Schaum's Outline of Advanced Mathematics for Engineers and Scientists
Spotted an error? Send a correction. Read how we write and check articles in our editorial policy.