Ma · Mathematics

When Is $b^2c^2+c^2a^2+a^2b^2>abc(a+b+c)$ True?

Published By the 9to5Science editorial team

At a glance

  1. 1. Compare both sides

    Subtract the right-hand side from the left-hand side.

  2. 2. Rewrite as squares

    Use the identity for three squared terms minus their pairwise products.

  3. 3. Check equality

    For positive variables, equality holds exactly when a, b, and c are all equal.

  4. 4. State strictness correctly

    The inequality is strict except at equality; as written, it is not strict for every positive triple.

Assume first that a,b,ca,b,c are positive, as is usual for this kind of inequality. The strict inequality in the title needs an exception: when a=b=ca=b=c, the two sides are equal. The correct general statement is a non-strict inequality, with strict inequality whenever the three variables are not all equal.

A direct sum-of-squares identity proves the result and identifies exactly when equality occurs.

Subtract the right-hand side

Set x=bcx=bc, y=cay=ca, and z=abz=ab. The left-hand side of the proposed inequality is x2+y2+z2x^2+y^2+z^2. Its right-hand side can also be written using these three quantities:

xy+yz+zx=abc(c+a+b)=abc(a+b+c).xy+yz+zx =abc(c+a+b) =abc(a+b+c).

Now use the identity

x2+y2+z2−xy−yz−zx=12((x−y)2+(y−z)2+(z−x)2).x^2+y^2+z^2-xy-yz-zx =\frac12\bigl((x-y)^2+(y-z)^2+(z-x)^2\bigr).

Substituting x=bcx=bc, y=cay=ca, and z=abz=ab gives the exact difference between the two sides:

b2c2+c2a2+a2b2−abc(a+b+c)=12((bc−ca)2+(ca−ab)2+(ab−bc)2)≥0.\begin{aligned} &b^2c^2+c^2a^2+a^2b^2-abc(a+b+c)\\ &\qquad=\frac12\bigl((bc-ca)^2+(ca-ab)^2+(ab-bc)^2\bigr)\\ &\qquad\ge 0. \end{aligned}

Each term on the final line is a square, so the difference cannot be negative. Therefore

b2c2+c2a2+a2b2≥abc(a+b+c).b^2c^2+c^2a^2+a^2b^2\ge abc(a+b+c).

When is the inequality strict?

For equality, all three squares in the identity must be zero. That means

bc=ca=ab.bc=ca=ab.

If a,b,c>0a,b,c>0, divide these equalities by the positive variables: bc=cabc=ca gives b=ab=a, and ca=abca=ab gives c=bc=b. Thus equality holds exactly when a=b=ca=b=c.

Consequently, for positive variables the strict version is valid precisely when the variables are not all equal:

b2c2+c2a2+a2b2>abc(a+b+c)if a,b,c>0 and not all equal.b^2c^2+c^2a^2+a^2b^2>abc(a+b+c) \quad\text{if }a,b,c>0\text{ and not all equal.}

At a=b=c=ta=b=c=t with t>0t>0, both sides are 3t43t^4. In particular, a=b=c=1a=b=c=1 is a counterexample to the claim that the inequality is always strict.

A worked example

Take a=1a=1, b=2b=2, and c=3c=3. The left side is

b2c2+c2a2+a2b2=22⋅32+32⋅12+12⋅22=36+9+4=49,b^2c^2+c^2a^2+a^2b^2=2^2\cdot3^2+3^2\cdot1^2+1^2\cdot2^2=36+9+4=49,

while the right side is

abc(a+b+c)=1⋅2⋅3⋅(1+2+3)=36.abc(a+b+c)=1\cdot2\cdot3\cdot(1+2+3)=36.

The difference is 1313. The sum-of-squares identity checks the same result:

12((6−3)2+(3−2)2+(2−6)2)=12(9+1+16)=13.\frac12\bigl((6-3)^2+(3-2)^2+(2-6)^2\bigr) =\frac12(9+1+16)=13.

Since the variables are not all equal, the inequality is strict, as expected.

If the variables are not assumed positive

The sum-of-squares identity itself does not require positivity: it holds for all real a,b,ca,b,c. Thus the non-strict inequality remains true for arbitrary real variables. Equality occurs whenever ab=bc=caab=bc=ca; this includes a=b=ca=b=c, and also the cases where at least two variables are zero. For positive variables, the equality condition simplifies to a=b=ca=b=c.

Positivity matters when describing equality, not when establishing nonnegativity: the proof comes directly from squares and does not require dividing by a variable.

Common mistakes

  • Claiming strict inequality without checking equality. Any statement using >> must exclude a=b=ca=b=c; otherwise use ≥\ge.
  • Applying AM-GM without connecting the terms. AM-GM can be useful in inequality proofs, but here the direct identity is shorter and gives the equality condition immediately.
  • Dividing by a variable without knowing it is nonzero. The sum-of-squares proof works even when variables may be zero, so no division is needed.

Spotted an error? Send a correction. Read how we write and check articles in our editorial policy.