Ma · Mathematics

Minimum of 1/a + 4/b + 9/c When a + b + c = 6

Published By the 9to5Science editorial team

At a glance

  1. 1. Apply Cauchy–Schwarz

    Write each term as a square divided by a variable, then use the Engel form of Cauchy–Schwarz.

  2. 2. Use the constraint

    The denominator in the resulting bound is a + b + c, which equals 6.

  3. 3. Check equality

    Equality requires a, b, and c to be proportional to 1, 2, and 3.

  4. 4. Find the variables

    Use a + b + c = 6 to get a = 1, b = 2, and c = 3.

For positive real numbers a,b,ca,b,c with a+b+c=6a+b+c=6, the expression is minimized by assigning the variables in proportion to the square roots of their numerators. Here that gives a:b:c=1:2:3a:b:c=1:2:3. The minimum value is 6, attained at (a,b,c)=(1,2,3)(a,b,c)=(1,2,3).

Apply Cauchy–Schwarz

The Engel form of the Cauchy–Schwarz inequality states that, for positive xix_i and real uiu_i,

∑iui2xi≥(∑iui)2∑ixi.\sum_i \frac{u_i^2}{x_i} \geq \frac{(\sum_i u_i)^2}{\sum_i x_i}.

Choose (u1,u2,u3)=(1,2,3)(u_1,u_2,u_3)=(1,2,3) and (x1,x2,x3)=(a,b,c)(x_1,x_2,x_3)=(a,b,c). Then

1a+4b+9c≥(1+2+3)2a+b+c.\frac{1}{a}+\frac{4}{b}+\frac{9}{c} \geq \frac{(1+2+3)^2}{a+b+c}.

Substitute the constraint a+b+c=6a+b+c=6:

1a+4b+9c≥366=6.\frac{1}{a}+\frac{4}{b}+\frac{9}{c} \geq \frac{36}{6}=6.

Thus no allowed choice of a,b,ca,b,c can make the expression smaller than 6. This is a lower bound; to prove it is the actual minimum, check that equality can occur.

Find the equality case

In this form of Cauchy–Schwarz, equality holds when the ratios ui/xiu_i/x_i are all equal. In this problem, that condition is

1a=2b=3c.\frac{1}{a}=\frac{2}{b}=\frac{3}{c}.

Equivalently, a:b:c=1:2:3a:b:c=1:2:3. Write a=ka=k, b=2kb=2k, and c=3kc=3k. The sum constraint gives

k+2k+3k=6,k+2k+3k=6,

so k=1k=1 and therefore (a,b,c)=(1,2,3)(a,b,c)=(1,2,3). These are positive numbers and satisfy the constraint. Substitution confirms the bound is attained:

11+42+93=1+2+3=6.\frac{1}{1}+\frac{4}{2}+\frac{9}{3}=1+2+3=6.

Since the expression is always at least 6 and equals 6 for an allowed triple, its minimum is exactly 6.

Why the variables are not equal

The numerators are different, so splitting the available sum equally among a,b,ca,b,c does not generally minimize the expression. The equality condition shows how the allocation should change: a term with a larger numerator needs a proportionally larger denominator. In general, for positive pip_i and positive xix_i with fixed sum SS, Cauchy–Schwarz gives

∑ipixi=∑i(pi)2xi≥(∑ipi)2S.\sum_i \frac{p_i}{x_i} =\sum_i \frac{(\sqrt{p_i})^2}{x_i} \geq \frac{(\sum_i \sqrt{p_i})^2}{S}.

Equality occurs when xix_i is proportional to pi\sqrt{p_i}. In this question, the numerators are 1,4,91,4,9, whose square roots are 1,2,31,2,3. Their sum is 6, so the equality allocation under a total of 6 is exactly (1,2,3)(1,2,3).

Common mistakes

  • Using a=b=c=2a=b=c=2 without checking equality. This is a valid triple, but it gives 1/2+4/2+9/2=71/2+4/2+9/2=7, not the minimum.
  • Treating the numerators themselves as the allocation ratio. The equality condition uses their square roots: a:b:c=1:4:9=1:2:3a:b:c=\sqrt{1}:\sqrt{4}:\sqrt{9}=1:2:3.
  • Stopping at a lower bound. An inequality alone shows the expression is at least 6. You must also exhibit an allowed triple where it equals 6 to establish the minimum.
  • Allowing a variable to be zero. The expression contains reciprocals, so the variables must be strictly positive. The equality triple satisfies this requirement.

References

  1. G. H. Hardy, J. E. Littlewood, and G. Pólya, Inequalities

Spotted an error? Send a correction. Read how we write and check articles in our editorial policy.