Difference Between Supremum and Upper Bounds
At a glance
- 1. Define an upper bound
A number bounds a set above when every set element is less than or equal to it.
- 2. Find all upper bounds
The supremum is the smallest number among all upper bounds.
- 3. Repeat below
A lower bound is below every element; the infimum is the greatest lower bound.
- 4. Check membership
A supremum or infimum need not belong to the set; membership gives a maximum or minimum.
An upper bound is any number that lies above every element of a set. A supremum is the least, or smallest, upper bound. Thus, every supremum is an upper bound, but most upper bounds are not the supremum.
The lower-bound distinction is the mirror image: a lower bound lies below every element, while the infimum is the greatest lower bound.
Definitions
Let be a nonempty subset of .
A number is an upper bound of if
A number is a lower bound of if
If has at least one upper bound, its supremum, written , is the smallest upper bound. Formally, when:
- is an upper bound of ; and
- every upper bound of satisfies .
Likewise, when:
- is a lower bound of ; and
- every lower bound of satisfies .
The words least and greatest refer to the ordering of real numbers, not to membership in the set.
Worked example: a finite set
Take
Every number at least is an upper bound, so the set of upper bounds is
The smallest of these upper bounds is . Therefore,
Similarly, every number at most is a lower bound. The set of lower bounds is
so
Here, both extremal values belong to . Consequently, is not only the supremum but also the maximum, and is both the infimum and the minimum.
A supremum need not belong to the set
Consider the open interval
The numbers , , and are all upper bounds, because every satisfies . In fact, every number at least is an upper bound:
The least one is , so
But . Therefore, has no maximum. The distinction is:
- is the supremum because it is the least upper bound.
- is not a maximum because it is not an element of .
For the lower side, is the infimum of , but is not in the set, so there is no minimum.
Another example: a supremum defined by a square root
Let
This is the interval . Its supremum is :
- Every satisfies , so is an upper bound.
- No number smaller than is an upper bound. If , one can choose a number in sufficiently close to that is greater than .
Thus,
The supremum is not in , since the definition requires , whereas . Hence has no maximum. Its infimum is , and because , its minimum is .
How to recognize the supremum in practice
To prove that a candidate number is , use two tests:
1. Prove it is an upper bound
Show that
2. Prove no smaller number works
Show that for every , there is some with
This says that every number below fails to be an upper bound. An equivalent formulation uses the approximation property: for every , there is an such that
For an infimum, reverse the inequalities. Prove that for every , then show that every number greater than fails to be a lower bound. Equivalently, for every , some satisfies
Common mistakes
Calling every upper bound the supremum
If , then is an upper bound but not the supremum. The supremum is , because and is still an upper bound.
Assuming the supremum belongs to the set
Open intervals provide the standard counterexample. The supremum of is , even though is excluded.
Confusing maximum with supremum
A maximum must be an element of the set and must be at least as large as every other element. A supremum only needs to be the least upper bound; it may be outside the set.
Reversing “least” and “greatest”
The supremum is the least upper bound. The infimum is the greatest lower bound. For upper bounds, move downward until no further move is possible; for lower bounds, move upward.
Ignoring boundedness
In the real numbers, a nonempty set must be bounded above for its supremum to be a real number, and bounded below for its infimum to be a real number. For example, has no real supremum or infimum. Some texts use the extended real numbers and write and , but these are not real numbers.
References
- Understanding Analysis, Stephen Abbott
- Principles of Mathematical Analysis, Walter Rudin
Spotted an error? Send a correction. Read how we write and check articles in our editorial policy.