Ma · Mathematics

What Is a Core for an Unbounded Operator?

Published By the 9to5Science editorial team

At a glance

  1. 1. Choose a subdomain

    Start with a linear operator and a candidate subdomain contained in its domain.

  2. 2. Use the graph norm

    Measure approximation in both the vector and its image under the operator.

  3. 3. Check graph density

    The candidate is a core when its graph is dense in the operator's graph.

  4. 4. Compare closures

    Equivalently, restricting the operator to the core does not change its closure.

A core is a smaller domain on which an unbounded operator is fully determined by limits. This idea is useful because an operator may be difficult to work with on its entire domain, while a simpler subdomain—such as smooth functions—can still contain all the information needed to recover it by closure.

The key is to measure density in the graph norm, which accounts for both a vector and the operator applied to it. Ordinary density in the underlying Hilbert space is not enough.

Definition of a core

Let T:D(T)⊆H→HT:D(T)\subseteq H\to H be a linear operator on a Hilbert space. For u∈D(T)u\in D(T), define the graph norm by

∥u∥T=(∥u∥2+∥Tu∥2)1/2.\|u\|_T=\bigl(\|u\|^2+\|Tu\|^2\bigr)^{1/2}.

A linear subspace D0⊆D(T)D_0\subseteq D(T) is a core for TT if it is dense in D(T)D(T) with respect to this norm. Equivalently, the graph

{(u,Tu):u∈D0}\{(u,Tu):u\in D_0\}

is dense in the graph of TT in the product space H×HH\times H.

In concrete terms, for every u∈D(T)u\in D(T) there must be a sequence un∈D0u_n\in D_0 such that both

un→uandTun→Tu u_n\to u \quad\text{and}\quad Tu_n\to Tu

in HH. Approximating uu alone does not establish that D0D_0 is a core; the operator images must converge to the right limit too.

The closure criterion

If TT is closable, its closure T‾\overline T is the operator whose graph is the closure of the graph of TT. The core condition can then be written as

T∣D0‾=T‾.\overline{T|_{D_0}}=\overline T.

Thus, starting with the restriction of TT to D0D_0 and closing that restriction gives the same operator as closing TT on its full domain. If TT is already closed, this becomes T∣D0‾=T\overline{T|_{D_0}}=T.

This characterization also explains the word “core”: the restricted operator retains enough graph information to reconstruct the whole closed operator.

Worked example: multiplication by the variable

Consider the operator MxM_x on L2(R)L^2(\mathbb R) defined by

(Mxf)(x)=xf(x),D(Mx)={f∈L2(R):xf∈L2(R)}.(M_x f)(x)=x f(x), \qquad D(M_x)=\{f\in L^2(\mathbb R):xf\in L^2(\mathbb R)\}.

The space Cc∞(R)C_c^\infty(\mathbb R) of smooth, compactly supported functions is a core for MxM_x. Its graph norm is

∥f∥Mx2=∥f∥22+∥xf∥22=∫R(1+x2)∣f(x)∣2 dx.\|f\|_{M_x}^2=\|f\|_2^2+\|xf\|_2^2 =\int_{\mathbb R}(1+x^2)|f(x)|^2\,dx.

To see why smooth compactly supported functions are dense in this norm, take any f∈D(Mx)f\in D(M_x) and first truncate it: let fR=f 1[−R,R]f_R=f\,\mathbf{1}_{[-R,R]}. Then

∥f−fR∥Mx2=∫∣x∣>R(1+x2)∣f(x)∣2 dx⟶0\|f-f_R\|_{M_x}^2=\int_{|x|>R}(1+x^2)|f(x)|^2\,dx\longrightarrow 0

as R→∞R\to\infty, because the integrand is integrable by the definition of the domain. For fixed RR, approximate fRf_R in ordinary L2L^2 by smooth functions supported in a slightly larger bounded interval. On that interval, 1+x21+x^2 is bounded, so this approximation also converges in the graph norm. Combining the truncation and smooth approximation gives a sequence from Cc∞(R)C_c^\infty(\mathbb R) converging to ff in graph norm.

Therefore Cc∞(R)C_c^\infty(\mathbb R) is a core. Notice that this conclusion is stronger than saying it is dense in L2(R)L^2(\mathbb R): it also guarantees convergence after applying MxM_x.

How to check a proposed core

For a candidate subspace D0D_0, the most direct approach is to take an arbitrary u∈D(T)u\in D(T) and construct un∈D0u_n\in D_0 with both un→uu_n\to u and Tun→TuTu_n\to Tu. Alternatively, show that D0D_0 is dense in D(T)D(T) for the graph norm. For differential operators, this often means proving approximation in a function-space norm that controls both the function and the relevant derivatives.

When TT is closed, it is also enough to show that every graph point (u,Tu)(u,Tu) is a limit of graph points (un,Tun)(u_n,Tu_n) with un∈D0u_n\in D_0. This is exactly the graph-density condition, expressed without introducing a separate norm.

Common mistakes

  • Checking only density in HH. A subspace can be dense in the Hilbert space but fail to approximate operator images. That does not make it a core.
  • Ignoring the domain. A candidate core must be a subspace of D(T)D(T). It is not enough for its elements to be in the ambient space.
  • Confusing a core with the whole domain. A core may be a proper subdomain; its defining property is that restriction to it leaves the closure unchanged.
  • Mixing operator cores with form cores. A core for a quadratic form is defined using the form norm, which is generally different from the graph norm of an operator. State which notion is meant, especially in discussions of self-adjoint operators.

References

  1. Methods of Modern Mathematical Physics, Vol. I: Functional Analysis — Michael Reed and Barry Simon
  2. Perturbation Theory for Linear Operators — Tosio Kato

Spotted an error? Send a correction. Read how we write and check articles in our editorial policy.