Ma · Mathematics

A Sequence of Irrational Numbers with a Rational Limit

Published By the 9to5Science editorial team

At a glance

  1. 1. Choose an irrational term

    Use a fixed irrational number such as √2.

  2. 2. Make terms shrink

    Divide it by n, so the irrational part approaches zero.

  3. 3. Verify irrationality

    A nonzero rational multiple of an irrational number remains irrational.

  4. 4. Compute the limit

    Since √2/n approaches zero, the sequence converges to the rational number 0.

A sequence of irrational numbers can converge to a rational number. The key point is that the limit of a sequence does not have to belong to the set containing all of its terms.

A simple example is

an=2n,n=1,2,3,…a_n=\frac{\sqrt{2}}{n}, \qquad n=1,2,3,\ldots

Every term is irrational, while the sequence converges to 00, which is rational.

Why every term is irrational

For every positive integer nn, the number 1/n1/n is a nonzero rational number. If 2/n\sqrt{2}/n were rational, multiplying it by the rational number nn would imply that 2\sqrt{2} was rational. That is impossible.

Therefore,

2n∉Q\frac{\sqrt{2}}{n}\notin\mathbb{Q}

for every positive integer nn. The first few terms are

2,22,23,24,…\sqrt{2},\quad \frac{\sqrt{2}}{2},\quad \frac{\sqrt{2}}{3},\quad \frac{\sqrt{2}}{4},\ldots

and all of them are irrational.

Why the limit is rational

Because 2\sqrt{2} is a fixed constant,

lim⁡n→∞2n=2lim⁡n→∞1n=2⋅0=0.\lim_{n\to\infty}\frac{\sqrt{2}}{n} =\sqrt{2}\lim_{n\to\infty}\frac{1}{n} =\sqrt{2}\cdot 0 =0.

The number 00 is rational because 0=0/10=0/1.

An epsilon proof says the same thing without relying only on limit laws. Given any ε>0\varepsilon>0, choose an integer NN such that

N>2ε.N>\frac{\sqrt{2}}{\varepsilon}.

Then, whenever n≥Nn\geq N,

∣an−0∣=2n≤2N<ε.\left|a_n-0\right|=\frac{\sqrt{2}}{n} \leq \frac{\sqrt{2}}{N}<\varepsilon.

Thus an→0a_n\to 0 by the definition of convergence.

A sequence converging to any rational number

The same construction works for every rational limit. Let q∈Qq\in\mathbb{Q} and define

an=q+2n.a_n=q+\frac{\sqrt{2}}{n}.

The term 2/n\sqrt{2}/n is irrational. Adding a rational number to an irrational number produces an irrational number: if q+2/nq+\sqrt{2}/n were rational, subtracting qq would make 2/n\sqrt{2}/n rational, a contradiction.

On the other hand,

lim⁡n→∞an=lim⁡n→∞(q+2n)=q+0=q.\lim_{n\to\infty}a_n =\lim_{n\to\infty}\left(q+\frac{\sqrt{2}}{n}\right) =q+0=q.

For example, with q=3/5q=3/5,

an=35+2na_n=\frac{3}{5}+\frac{\sqrt{2}}{n}

has only irrational terms and converges to the rational number 3/53/5.

The set-theoretic reason

The rational numbers Q\mathbb{Q} and irrational numbers R∖Q\mathbb{R}\setminus\mathbb{Q} are both dense in the real numbers. This means that every open interval around every real number contains both rational and irrational numbers.

In particular, irrational numbers occur arbitrarily close to a rational number. A sequence can choose irrational numbers closer and closer to a rational target. The example 2/n\sqrt{2}/n chooses irrational numbers approaching 00.

In terms of closed sets, the irrational numbers are not a closed subset of R\mathbb{R}. A closed set must contain the limits of all convergent sequences whose terms lie in that set. Since the sequence 2/n\sqrt{2}/n lies entirely among the irrationals but has limit 00, which is not irrational, the irrational numbers are not closed.

By contrast, the rational numbers are also not closed in R\mathbb{R}. For example, the sequence of rational decimal truncations of 2\sqrt{2} converges to the irrational number 2\sqrt{2}.

A concrete numerical example

Take an=2/na_n=\sqrt{2}/n. Since 2≈1.4142\sqrt{2}\approx1.4142, the first terms are approximately

nnana_n
11.4142
20.7071
50.2828
100.1414
1000.0141
10000.0014

The values never equal 00, and none is rational, but they can be made as close to 00 as desired. That is exactly what convergence to 00 means.

Common mistakes

Assuming the limit must have the same type as every term

This is false unless the set of possible terms is closed. A sequence of integers that converges in R\mathbb{R} must eventually be constant, so its limit is an integer. But irrational numbers do not have this property.

Thinking irrational plus rational is always irrational without checking the rational is nonzero

The statement is true: rational plus irrational is irrational, including when the rational number is zero. For multiplication, however, the rational multiplier must be nonzero. Multiplying an irrational number by 00 gives the rational number 00.

Using a sequence that includes rational terms

For instance, 1/n+2/n1/n+\sqrt{2}/n is fine because it equals (1+2)/n(1+\sqrt{2})/n and is irrational. But a sequence such as 1/n1/n does not answer the question: its terms are rational, not irrational.

The essential example is therefore

an=2n,an∈R∖Q,an→0∈Q.\boxed{a_n=\frac{\sqrt{2}}{n},\qquad a_n\in\mathbb{R}\setminus\mathbb{Q},\qquad a_n\to 0\in\mathbb{Q}.}

References

  1. Walter Rudin, Principles of Mathematical Analysis
  2. Stephen Abbott, Understanding Analysis

Spotted an error? Send a correction. Read how we write and check articles in our editorial policy.