Ma · Mathematics

Are Borel Measures on Compact Metric Spaces Regular?

Published By the 9to5Science editorial team

At a glance

  1. 1. State the assumptions

    Use the standard theorem for a finite Borel measure on a compact metric space.

  2. 2. Define regularity

    Approximate each Borel set from outside by open sets and from inside by compact sets.

  3. 3. Approximate open sets

    Exhaust an open set by closed distance neighborhoods, which are compact.

  4. 4. Extend to Borel sets

    Use finiteness and closure under complements and countable unions.

Yes—under the standard assumption that the Borel measure is finite. If XX is a compact metric space, [?][?] and EE is a Borel subset of XX, then EE can be enclosed by open sets whose measures approach [?][?], and it contains compact sets whose measures approach [?][?]. This is the regularity property used throughout measure theory and analysis.

The word “Borel measure” does not by itself always imply finiteness. The theorem below is stated for finite measures; a locally finite Borel measure on a compact space is finite, since the whole space is compact. If a text uses “regular Borel measure” as a defined term, check its convention and assumptions.

What regularity means

A measure μ\mu on the Borel sets of XX is regular if every Borel set EE satisfies both

μ(E)=inf⁡{μ(U):E⊆U, U open}\mu(E)=\inf\{\mu(U): E\subseteq U,\ U\text{ open}\}

and

μ(E)=sup⁡{μ(K):K⊆E, K compact}.\mu(E)=\sup\{\mu(K): K\subseteq E,\ K\text{ compact}\}.

These are called outer regularity and inner regularity, respectively. The equalities mean that for every ε>0\varepsilon>0, there are an open UU and a compact KK such that K⊆E⊆UK\subseteq E\subseteq U and

μ(U∖E)<ε,μ(E∖K)<ε.\mu(U\setminus E)<\varepsilon,\qquad \mu(E\setminus K)<\varepsilon.

The sets UU and KK need not equal EE. Regularity says they can approximate it in measure.

Why open sets have compact inner approximations

Let U⊆XU\subseteq X be open, and suppose first that U≠XU\ne X. For each positive integer nn, define

Kn={x∈X:d(x,X∖U)≥1/n}.K_n=\{x\in X: d(x,X\setminus U)\ge 1/n\}.

The distance-to-a-set function is continuous, so KnK_n is closed in XX. Since XX is compact, each KnK_n is compact. Also, Kn⊆UK_n\subseteq U, the sets increase with nn, and every point of UU has positive distance from the complement in some sufficiently small neighborhood. Therefore U=⋃n=1∞KnU=\bigcup_{n=1}^{\infty}K_n.

Continuity of measure from below now gives

μ(U)=lim⁡n→∞μ(Kn)=sup⁡nμ(Kn).\mu(U)=\lim_{n\to\infty}\mu(K_n)=\sup_n\mu(K_n).

If U=XU=X, simply take Kn=XK_n=X. Thus every open set is inner regular. It is outer regular immediately, because the set itself is an open superset.

Extending the result to all Borel sets

Consider the collection of sets that have both compact inner approximations and open outer approximations. It contains every open set by the preceding argument. For a finite measure, this collection is closed under complements: a compact approximation to a set gives an open approximation to its complement by taking the complement of the compact set, and an open approximation gives a compact approximation to the complement in the same way.

It is also closed under countable unions. For outer approximation, choose an open superset for each set with errors whose sum is less than a chosen ε\varepsilon, then take their union. For inner approximation, first approximate the countable union in measure by a finite partial union, using continuity from below. Approximate each of those finitely many sets from inside by a compact set; the finite union of the compact approximations is compact. These arguments use finiteness of μ(X)\mu(X), in particular when passing between a set and its complement.

The collection is therefore a sigma-algebra containing the open sets, so it contains the Borel sigma-algebra they generate. This proves regularity for every Borel set.

Worked example on the unit interval

Take X=[0,1]X=[0,1] with the usual metric and Lebesgue measure, and let E=[0,1/2)E=[0,1/2). For 0<δ<1/40<\delta<1/4, choose

Kδ=[δ,1/2−δ],Uδ=[0,1/2+δ).K_\delta=[\delta,1/2-\delta],\qquad U_\delta=[0,1/2+\delta).

These are, respectively, compact and relatively open in [0,1][0,1], and Kδ⊆E⊆UδK_\delta\subseteq E\subseteq U_\delta. Their measure errors are

μ(E∖Kδ)=2δ,μ(Uδ∖E)=δ.\mu(E\setminus K_\delta)=2\delta,\qquad \mu(U_\delta\setminus E)=\delta.

Given any ε>0\varepsilon>0, choosing δ<min⁡(ε/2,1/4)\delta<\min(\varepsilon/2,1/4) makes both errors less than ε\varepsilon. The compact set misses only a short interval near the left endpoint of EE and a short interval near its right endpoint; the open set adds only a short interval beyond 1/21/2.

Common mistakes

  • Assuming every Borel set is compact or open. Regularity provides approximating sets; it does not say the Borel set itself has either property.
  • Omitting the finiteness assumption. Continuity from above and the complement argument require care for infinite measures. A general infinite Borel measure should not automatically be treated as covered by the finite-measure theorem.
  • Confusing compactness with boundedness. Compactness here follows because the approximating sets are closed subsets of the compact space XX. In a general metric space, closed sets need not be compact.
  • Reversing the inclusions. Inner approximation uses K⊆EK\subseteq E with KK compact; outer approximation uses E⊆UE\subseteq U with UU open.

References

  1. Real Analysis: Modern Techniques and Their Applications — Gerald B. Folland
  2. Real and Complex Analysis — Walter Rudin

Spotted an error? Send a correction. Read how we write and check articles in our editorial policy.