What Is the MGF of the Ratio X/Y?
At a glance
- 1. Specify the joint law
The ratio depends on how X and Y are distributed together, not just on their separate distributions.
- 2. Find the ratio distribution
When a joint density exists and Y is nonzero, transform the variables to obtain the density of X/Y.
- 3. Check exponential integrability
Evaluate E[exp(tX/Y)] and check whether it is finite for every t in some open interval around zero.
- 4. State the existence result
If no such interval exists, the ratio has no moment-generating function in the usual sense.
There is no universal MGF for the ratio . Its distribution depends on the joint behavior of and , and the expectation defining its MGF may be infinite for every nonzero value of the argument.
The general expression is , provided with probability 1 and the expectation is finite. Here is how to find the ratio distribution when densities are available, and why the MGF may still fail to exist.
The general formula
A random variable’s moment-generating function is . For , this becomes
This expression is useful only when its expectation is finite. By the usual definition, an MGF must be finite for all in some open interval containing zero. A value at alone, where , does not establish that an MGF exists.
If has joint density and , the ratio has density
The factor is the absolute Jacobian of the transformation . Once you have this density, test whether
exists and is finite around . If and are independent with densities, you can use in the ratio-density formula. Independence is not required, but the joint distribution is needed.
Worked example: a ratio of standard normals
Let and be independent standard normal random variables. Each has an MGF, , but their ratio does not.
Using the density transformation,
where is the standard normal density. This is the standard Cauchy density. For , the integral diverges in the positive tail. For , it diverges in the negative tail. Thus is infinite for every , even though both variables in the ratio have MGFs.
A positive ratio can also lack an MGF
Let and be independent exponential random variables with rate 1. Both are positive, and the density of is
For , the exponential factor makes the MGF integral diverge. For , the integral is finite, but that gives only a one-sided range of finite values, not an open interval around zero. So this ratio does not have an MGF under the usual definition either.
Common mistakes
- Using the separate MGFs of and . The MGF of a ratio is not obtained by dividing one MGF by another. The ratio depends on the joint distribution.
- Assuming independence without being told. Marginal distributions alone do not determine the distribution of ; dependence can change it.
- Treating as proof of existence. The expectation must be finite in a neighborhood of zero, not just at zero.
- Ignoring a possible zero denominator. If , the ratio is not defined on an event with positive probability unless a special convention is specified.
- Confusing an MGF with a characteristic function. The characteristic function exists for every real because its integrand has absolute value 1. That does not imply the MGF exists.
To answer a particular ratio problem, first specify the joint law (or independence and both marginal laws), then derive the ratio distribution or evaluate , and finally check finiteness on both sides of zero.
References
- An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications, Volume II — William Feller
Spotted an error? Send a correction. Read how we write and check articles in our editorial policy.