Why Must a Group of Order 27 Have a Subgroup of Order 3?
At a glance
- 1. Choose a nonidentity element
A group with 27 elements contains some element other than the identity.
- 2. Apply Lagrange’s theorem
The element’s order divides 27, so it is 3, 9, or 27.
- 3. Take a power
A suitable power of that element has order 3 and generates the required subgroup.
Every group with 27 elements has a subgroup with exactly 3 elements. The quickest proof uses Lagrange’s theorem: the order of any element divides the order of the group. Since 27 is a power of 3, any nonidentity element has order 3, 9, or 27, and each possibility gives an element of order 3.
The resulting subgroup is cyclic. If is an element of order 3, then , where is the identity.
The proof using Lagrange’s theorem
Let be a group with . Because the identity is only one of its elements, there is a nonidentity element . Write for the order of , meaning the smallest positive integer for which .
The subgroup has elements. By Lagrange’s theorem, the order of a subgroup divides the order of the finite group containing it. Therefore
The positive divisors of 27 are 1, 3, 9, and 27. Since is not the identity, its order is not 1. Thus is one of 3, 9, or 27.
If , then itself has order 3. If , then has order 3. If , then has order 3. In every case, there is an element of order 3, and its generated subgroup
has exactly three elements. That proves the claim.
Why the powers have order 3
For an element of finite order , the order of is
In the two cases where we take a power, this gives
when , and
when . These calculations explain why those powers generate subgroups of order 3.
A concrete example
Consider the cyclic group under addition. The element has order 27. Taking nine times that element gives , whose additive order is 3: the elements generated by are
This is a subgroup with three elements. The same conclusion holds for every group of order 27, even if the group is not cyclic or not abelian; the proof depends only on Lagrange’s theorem and the possible element orders.
The connection to Cauchy’s theorem
Cauchy’s theorem says that if a prime divides the order of a finite group, then the group contains an element of order . Here divides , so Cauchy’s theorem directly guarantees an element of order 3. The argument above is a particularly short proof for groups whose order is a power of 3: any nonidentity element has order a nontrivial power of 3, and a suitable power of it has order 3.
More generally, if a finite group has order for a prime , then it has a subgroup of order . Choose a nonidentity element of order ; raising it to the power produces an element of order .
Common mistakes
- Assuming the group must be cyclic. A group of order 27 need not be cyclic. The proof works for every group of that order.
- Thinking the chosen element must already have order 3. It might have order 9 or 27; taking a power produces an element of order 3.
- Confusing an element with its generated subgroup. An element of order 3 generates a subgroup with three elements, including the identity. The subgroup is not just the set containing that element.
- Using Lagrange’s theorem in the wrong direction. Lagrange says subgroup orders divide the group order; it does not say that every divisor must occur as a subgroup order. The power argument (or Cauchy’s theorem) supplies the existence here.
References
- A First Course in Abstract Algebra — John B. Fraleigh
Spotted an error? Send a correction. Read how we write and check articles in our editorial policy.