How to Prove a Multivariable Limit with Epsilon and Delta
At a glance
- 1. State the definition
Use the Euclidean distance from (x,y) to the point where the limit is taken.
- 2. Rewrite the difference
Subtract the proposed limit from the function and find a useful upper bound.
- 3. Relate distances
Bound the expression using the distance that appears in the definition.
- 4. Choose delta
Make the upper bound smaller than epsilon by choosing delta accordingly.
A limit of a function of two variables is proved by showing that points sufficiently close to make the function value sufficiently close to . The distance is measured in the plane, usually with the Euclidean norm. The proof follows the same logic as a one-variable - proof, but the input can approach the point from any direction.
The definition for two variables
The statement
means that for every , there is a such that
The quantity is the Euclidean distance between and . The condition that this distance is positive excludes the point itself; a limit concerns nearby points, not necessarily the function’s value at the point.
The order of the choices matters: you are given an arbitrary , and then you must specify a suitable . Your choice may depend on , but not on the particular point .
A practical proof method
Start by examining . Try to rewrite or estimate it in terms of , , or the combined distance
Useful inequalities include and . If you can show that near for some constant , then choosing is often enough. If your estimate only works in a restricted neighborhood, also require to be small enough to stay in that neighborhood.
A typical proof therefore has four parts: let be arbitrary; choose ; assume ; and use the estimate to prove .
Worked example: a limit at a nonzero point
Prove that
Let . Factor the difference from the proposed limit:
We first restrict the points to be within distance of . Then and , so and . Consequently, and . Thus
Each coordinate difference is no greater than the Euclidean distance . Therefore,
Choose
If , then the estimates above apply and
This proves the limit. The minimum in the choice of handles two requirements at once: staying within distance for the bounds, and making the final error less than .
Using paths to test a proposed limit
A limit must work along every way of approaching . If two paths approaching the point give different limiting function values, the multivariable limit does not exist. For example, consider
Along , the function is for nonzero . Along , it is . Since these approach different values as , the limit does not exist. Path checks can disprove a limit, but checking a few paths cannot prove one: a successful epsilon-delta argument must cover all nearby points.
Common mistakes
- Using separate coordinate conditions without connecting them to the definition. You may work with and , but explain how the distance condition controls them. If , then both coordinate differences are less than .
- Choosing before seeing the needed bound. Derive an estimate for first, then choose to make that estimate less than .
- Forgetting local restrictions. Factoring expressions often produces terms such as that need to be bounded. Restricting (or another convenient radius) can provide those bounds; include that restriction in the choice of .
- Treating path checks as a proof of existence. Agreement along several paths is not enough to control every direction or curved approach.
- Requiring the function to equal the limit at the point. The definition uses nearby points with positive distance from , so may be different or undefined.
References
- Calculus: Early Transcendentals, James Stewart
- Calculus, Volume II, Tom M. Apostol
Spotted an error? Send a correction. Read how we write and check articles in our editorial policy.