What Is the Eccentricity of an Ellipse?
At a glance
- 1. Identify the Semiaxes
Let a be the longer semiaxis and b the shorter one, so a is at least b.
- 2. Find the Focal Distance
Use c squared equals a squared minus b squared; c measures the center-to-focus distance.
- 3. Calculate Eccentricity
Divide c by a. The result e is dimensionless and lies from zero up to, but not including, one.
- 4. Check the Meaning
The foci are c apart, not e apart; e describes the ellipse’s shape, not its size.
The word eccentricity is easy to confuse with the distance between an ellipse’s foci. They are related, but they are not the same quantity: focal distance has units of length, while eccentricity is a dimensionless number describing the ellipse’s shape.
For the standard ellipse with major semiaxis and minor semiaxis , the numerical eccentricity is
where is the distance from the center to either focus. The distance between the two foci is .
The three quantities to keep separate
Assume the ellipse is centered at the origin, with its longer axis along the -axis:
Here, and are semiaxis lengths. The full major and minor axis lengths are and . The foci are at , with
These definitions give three related but distinct measurements:
| Quantity | Meaning | Units |
|---|---|---|
| Center-to-focus distance | Length | |
| Distance between the foci | Length | |
| Numerical eccentricity | None |
Because , dividing by gives
The square root is nonnegative. Since , an ellipse has .
Why eccentricity measures shape
If you enlarge an ellipse by the same scale factor in every direction, its values of , , and all grow by that factor. Their ratio stays unchanged. That is why eccentricity describes shape rather than size.
A circle is the special case . Then , the two foci coincide at the center, and . As the ellipse gets more elongated, gets smaller and gets closer to . A nondegenerate ellipse never has ; that value is associated with a parabola in the usual classification of conic sections.
Worked example
Consider
The semiaxes are and . Find the focal distance:
So the foci are and . Their distance apart is . The eccentricity, however, is
You can check it using the other formula:
Thus is the center-to-focus distance, is the focus-to-focus distance, and is the eccentricity. None of these should be substituted for another without converting.
If the major axis is vertical
For an ellipse with its longer axis along the -axis, the equation is commonly written
with . Its foci are , but the same relationships hold: and . The letter still denotes the larger semiaxis, not necessarily the denominator under .
Common mistakes
- Calling the eccentricity. In standard ellipse notation, is a length; eccentricity is .
- Using the full axis lengths in the formula without care. If you know the full major and minor axis lengths and , use ; the factor of cancels. Do not divide the focal distance by the full major axis length.
- Assuming always belongs under . First identify which semiaxis is longer. For a vertical ellipse, the larger denominator is under .
- Treating as a distance. Eccentricity has no units, so it cannot be a number of centimeters or meters.
- Thinking every ellipse has two distinct foci. A circle has coincident foci, which is why its eccentricity is zero.
A useful check is to make sure your answer for an ellipse’s numerical eccentricity is between and , and that your formula uses the longer semiaxis in the denominator.
References
- OpenStax, Precalculus 2e, Conic Sections
- George B. Thomas et al., Thomas’ Calculus: Early Transcendentals
Spotted an error? Send a correction. Read how we write and check articles in our editorial policy.