Ch · Chemistry

Are Pseudo-Zeroth-Order Reactions Possible?

Updated 13 October 2026

At a glance

  1. 1. Identify the reactant

    Specify which reactant’s concentration appears not to affect the measured rate.

  2. 2. Check the conditions

    Look for saturation or another condition that keeps the rate-limiting process nearly constant.

  3. 3. Use the limiting rate law

    Simplify the full rate law to see whether it becomes approximately independent of that reactant.

  4. 4. State the valid range

    Explain when the approximation holds and when changing concentration makes the rate vary again.

Yes. A reaction can show pseudo-zero-order kinetics when its rate is nearly independent of a reactant’s concentration under a particular set of conditions. Catalyst saturation is a common cause. The key qualification is that the zero-order behavior usually applies only over a limited concentration range, not throughout the reaction.

What “pseudo-zero-order” means

For a reactant SS, zero-order kinetics means its disappearance rate is independent of its concentration:

−d[S]dt=k0.-\frac{d[S]}{dt}=k_0.

Here, k0k_0 has units of concentration per unit time. If this rate law holds, integrating it gives [S]=[S]0−k0t[S]=[S]_0-k_0t: the concentration decreases linearly with time.

“Pseudo-zero-order” generally means that a reaction behaves this way approximately because of its conditions or mechanism. The rate may still depend on the concentration of a catalyst, another reactant, or the intensity of light. It is zero-order only with respect to the particular reactant whose concentration does not noticeably affect the rate.

The term is used for an observed kinetic regime, rather than necessarily describing a single elementary reaction step. Some authors simply call the observed behavior “zero-order kinetics”; others use “pseudo” to emphasize that the behavior is conditional or approximate.

How catalyst saturation produces the behavior

Consider an enzyme-catalyzed reaction in which a substrate SS is converted into product. The Michaelis–Menten rate law is

v=Vmax⁡[S]Km+[S],v=\frac{V_{\max}[S]}{K_m+[S]},

where Vmax⁡V_{\max} is the maximum rate and KmK_m is a concentration characteristic of the enzyme–substrate system. When the substrate concentration is much greater than KmK_m, the enzyme is close to saturation: most enzyme molecules are occupied by substrate. In that limit,

v≈Vmax⁡.v\approx V_{\max}.

The rate is then nearly independent of [S][S], so the reaction is approximately zero-order in substrate. The rate still depends on how much active enzyme is present, because changing the amount of enzyme changes Vmax⁡V_{\max}.

At low substrate concentration, where [S]≪Km[S]\ll K_m, the same rate law instead becomes

v≈Vmax⁡Km[S],v\approx \frac{V_{\max}}{K_m}[S],

which is first-order in substrate. Thus one reaction can appear zero-order at high substrate concentration and first-order at low substrate concentration.

A similar pattern can occur in heterogeneous catalysis. If reactant molecules occupy nearly all available catalyst surface sites, adding more reactant may have little effect on the number of occupied sites or the reaction rate. The rate can then be approximately zero-order in that reactant while the surface remains saturated.

Worked example: a saturated enzyme

Suppose an enzyme reaction has Km=0.010 mMK_m=0.010\,\mathrm{mM} and Vmax⁡=0.50 mM min−1V_{\max}=0.50\,\mathrm{mM\,min^{-1}}. Start with [S]=1.0 mM[S]=1.0\,\mathrm{mM}, which is 100 times KmK_m. The initial rate is

v=(0.50)(1.0)0.010+1.0=0.495 mM min−1.\begin{aligned} v&=\frac{(0.50)(1.0)}{0.010+1.0}\\ &=0.495\,\mathrm{mM\,min^{-1}}. \end{aligned}

This is about 99% of Vmax⁡V_{\max}, so treating the initial rate as constant is a reasonable approximation. A simple zero-order estimate predicts that after one minute the substrate concentration will be about 1.0−0.50=0.50 mM1.0-0.50=0.50\,\mathrm{mM}.

The exact Michaelis–Menten model gives the time to fall from [S]0[S]_0 to [S][S] as

t=[S]0−[S]+Kmln⁡([S]0/[S])Vmax⁡.t=\frac{[S]_0-[S]+K_m\ln([S]_0/[S])}{V_{\max}}.

For a fall from 1.01.0 to 0.50 mM0.50\,\mathrm{mM}, this gives about 1.0141.014 minutes. The zero-order estimate is therefore close over this interval. As the substrate concentration approaches KmK_m, however, saturation fades and the rate falls more noticeably. The zero-order approximation should not be extrapolated indefinitely.

How to check whether the behavior is real

Measure initial rates at several starting concentrations of the reactant while keeping other relevant conditions fixed, including catalyst amount, temperature, pH, and illumination where applicable. If the rates barely change across a high-concentration range but decline at lower concentrations, that supports a saturated, pseudo-zero-order regime.

It is also useful to check the concentration-versus-time data. A roughly straight-line decrease over a particular interval is consistent with zero-order behavior over that interval. Curvature as the reaction proceeds may indicate that the reactant is leaving the saturated range. Initial-rate measurements help separate this effect from changes caused by product buildup, catalyst deactivation, or other complications.

Common mistakes

  • Calling the reaction zero-order under all conditions. The order can change when substrate concentration leaves the saturated range.
  • Assuming the rate is independent of every substance. It may be zero-order in substrate but still depend on catalyst concentration or another reactant.
  • Confusing a constant measured concentration with zero-order kinetics. If an experiment keeps a reactant concentration fixed, a constant rate alone does not show that the rate is independent of that concentration. You must compare rates at different concentrations.
  • Extending the linear concentration law too far. The zero-order expression eventually predicts negative concentration, which signals that the approximation has been used beyond its valid range.

References

  1. IUPAC Compendium of Chemical Terminology (the Gold Book)
  2. Atkins’ Physical Chemistry, by Peter Atkins, Julio de Paula, and James Keeler

Spotted an error? Send a correction. Read how we write and check articles in our editorial policy.