How to Approximate Simple Functions by Step Functions Almost Uniformly
At a glance
- 1. Write level sets
Express the simple function as a finite sum of constants times indicators of measurable sets.
- 2. Approximate each set
On a finite interval, choose finite unions of intervals whose symmetric differences with the level sets have summable measures.
- 3. Build step functions
Replace each level-set indicator by the indicator of its interval approximation.
- 4. Control the tail
Outside a set of arbitrarily small measure, all sufficiently late approximations agree exactly with the original function.
A measurable simple function takes only finitely many values. On a finite interval, you can approximate it by step functions that converge almost uniformly: after removing a set of arbitrarily small measure, the approximations converge uniformly on what remains.
The key is to approximate each level set by a finite union of intervals, with errors small enough that their measures add to a finite total. The summability of those errors controls all later approximations at once.
The setting and the result
Let be a finite interval, equipped with Lebesgue measure, and let be a measurable simple function. Write its distinct values and level sets as
where the are constants and the are measurable and pairwise disjoint. The level set where may be included or omitted.
A step function here means a function constant on each interval of some finite partition of . Equivalently, it can be written as a finite linear combination of indicators of finite unions of intervals. The claim is that there is a sequence of such step functions that converges to almost uniformly.
Almost-uniform convergence means that for every , there is a measurable set with measure less than such that uniformly on .
Construct the approximations
Every Lebesgue-measurable subset of a finite interval can be approximated in measure by a finite union of intervals. In particular, for any , there is such a union with
where is the symmetric difference: the points belonging to exactly one of the two sets. This is a standard consequence of the regularity of Lebesgue measure.
For each and each level set , choose a finite union of intervals such that
Now define
Each is a step function: there are only finitely many interval endpoints among the sets , and those endpoints partition into finitely many subintervals on which every indicator, and hence , is constant.
Let
By subadditivity of measure,
At every point outside , all the relevant indicators agree, so . Thus any point that belongs to only finitely many satisfies for all sufficiently large .
Why the convergence is almost uniform
Fix . Choose large enough that
and remove the set . Its measure satisfies
For every and every , we have , so . In fact, the functions agree everywhere on for every . Therefore
which proves uniform convergence there. Since was arbitrary, the convergence is almost uniform.
Worked example
Suppose and
where and are disjoint measurable sets. For each , choose finite unions of intervals and satisfying
Then is a step function. The set on which either indicator might be wrong has measure less than . The union of these error sets over has measure at most . Given any , choose so that . Outside that union, for every , giving uniform convergence on a set whose complement has measure less than .
The approximating interval unions and need not be disjoint. That does not affect the argument: outside the error sets, their indicators match the original level-set indicators, which are what determine .
Common mistakes
- Using only that the errors tend to zero. The condition alone does not make the union of all later error sets small. Choose errors with a finite sum, as above.
- Confusing almost-uniform with pointwise convergence almost everywhere. Almost-uniform convergence requires uniform convergence after removing one small set. The tail-union argument supplies that stronger control.
- Ignoring the finite-measure setting. The interval approximation and the stated almost-uniform conclusion are being used on a finite-measure domain. On an infinite-measure domain, first specify an appropriate finite-measure setting or formulate a local version.
- Assuming this applies to every measurable function. The argument uses the fact that a simple function has finitely many level sets. Approximation results for general measurable functions require additional steps.
The essential mechanism is summability: approximate each level set with errors whose total measure is finite, then discard the union of all errors after a sufficiently late index.
References
- Real Analysis: Modern Techniques and Their Applications — Gerald B. Folland
- Real Analysis — H. L. Royden and Patrick M. Fitzpatrick
Spotted an error? Send a correction. Read how we write and check articles in our editorial policy.