Using Convolution Theorem to find the Laplace transform

1,379

The LT of a convolution of two functions is the product of the individual LTs. If you recall, we found that

$$\hat{f_T}(p) = \frac{2 - e^{-p T}}{p}$$

Thus, the LT of the above convolution is simply

$$\hat{h_{S*T}}(p) = \left ( \frac{2 - e^{-p S}}{p} \right )\left ( \frac{2 - e^{-p T}}{p} \right )$$

Share:
1,379

Author by

S F

Hi Im a mathematics student, trying to learn about topics which I am struggling with at school

Updated on August 01, 2022

• S F over 1 year

In previous questions I have used Laplace transform to find the inverse Laplace transform.

I have worked through this work booklet (http://www3.ul.ie/~mlc/support/Loughborough%20website/chap20/20_6.pdf ) and understand convolution theorem.However, this question threw me off perhaps the particular layout is the problem.

Part A which I understand how to was

$$f(t) = \begin{cases} 2 & \text{ } 0 \leq t < T \\ 1 & t \geq T \end{cases}$$

Part B however I dont understand

I know the convolution theorem is $$\int^t_0 f(t-x)g(x)\ dx =$$

But how to apply that to

Use convolution theorem to find the Laplace transform of

$$\int^t_0 du f_T(t-u)f_s (u), t>0$$

where fs(t) is the function in (1) replaced with T replaced by S

• S F over 10 years
so essentially what $$\int^t_0 du f_T(t-u)f_s (u), t>0$$ means is to find the Laplace transform using convolution We find the laplace transform using the previous method and then we multiply the laplace transform by itself but replacing t by s for the first function ?
• Ron Gordon over 10 years
@SF: that is the long and short of it.
• S F over 10 years
do I need to evaluate $$\hat{h_{S*T}}(p) = \left ( \frac{2 - e^{-p S}}{p} \right )\left ( \frac{2 - e^{-p T}}{p} \right )$$ between 0 and t ? in my workbook we would replace the first t with (t-x) and the 2nd t with x . that does not apply in this case
• Ron Gordon over 10 years
@SF: No, this is the transform. An interesting exercise is to actually evaluate that convolution - it is not trivial so far as I can see. But you were asked to find the transform which, as I showed, is rather straightforward.