Two Particle System with Identical Particles
The simple product $\psi_1(x_1)\psi_1(x_2)$ is already symmetric under $x_1 \leftrightarrow x_2$. So it is not necessary to symmetrize the wave function by adding in the term you get when you switch $x_1$ and $x_2$.
Djamillah
Updated on October 23, 2020Comments
-
Djamillah about 3 years
I'm studying for an exam in quantum mechanics and tried to calculate the ground state and the first two excited states of two identical bosons (spin 0) in an infinite one dimensional potential well.
As I've understood, the state for two identical bosons should be $\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(\psi_1(x_1)\psi_2(x_2)+\psi_1(x_2)\psi_2(x_1))$
However, in the solutions manual the correct answer is $\psi_1(x_1)\psi_1(x_2)\\$ for the ground state $\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(\psi_1(x_1)\psi_2(x_2)+\psi_1(x_2)\psi_2(x_1))\\$ for the first excited state and $\psi_2(x_1)\psi_2(x_2)$ for the second excited state
How can the ground state and the second excited state be represented by the simple product and not on the same form as in the first excited state? They are still identical, right? Or does this have to do with symmetry? In that case, how should I think to get it right?
-
Djamillah about 9 yearsYes, I can see that. But why are we just having $\psi_1$s in the simple product and not both $\psi_1$ and $\psi_2$ as in the first excited state?
-
Brian Moths about 9 yearsbecause $\psi_1$ is the ground state, and the lowest energy two-particle state is where both particles are in their ground state.
-
Djamillah about 9 yearsOk, so the ground state is defined as both particles in the ground state and the first state as one particle in the ground state and one in the first state? Then the third state should be one particle in the first state and one in the second state?
-
Brian Moths about 9 yearsYou should make that into a new question.