Quadratic Functions Problem

1,659

You got the right answer, namely $y = \frac 1 {294} x^2$, if, and only if, the origin is at the lowest point of the cable and in the middle point between the two towers. In this case, the vertex of the parabola coincides with the origin, so we have $V = (0, 0)$.

If you choose another point as the origin, your vertex will not have coordinates $(0, 0)$. This time, the parabola will have general form $y = a(x - x_v)^2 + y_v$, where $x_v$ and $y_v$ are the coordinates of the vertex. Put in another way, we have $V = (x_v, y_v)$. Let's say we choose as origin the point which lies below the leftmost tower, at the same level as the lowest point of the cable:

parabola

Now, how do we determine the equation of the parabola with respect to the new system of axes? Well, the coefficient $a$ is obviously the same, because the parabola is the same. What's changed? The vertex position! The vertex is now $V = (84, 0)$, yielding the equation $y = \frac 1 {294} (x - 84)^2 = \frac 1 {294} x^2 - \frac 47 x + 24$.

If you have to do it with another origin, the easiest case is to take the rightmost tower. I'm sure you can do it. If you have any doubts, do not hesitate to ask.

Share:
1,659

Related videos on Youtube

Admin
Author by

Admin

Updated on August 01, 2022

Comments

  • Admin
    Admin over 1 year

    Question: The main section of a certain bridge has cables in the shape of a parabola. Suppose that the points on the tops of the towers where the cables are attached are 168m apart and 24 vertically above the minimum height of the cables.

    • Choose two other locations for the origin. Write the corresponding quadratic function for the shape of the cables for each.

    So far I have found that the vertex form that represents the shape of the cables is 1/294x^2. When I try to attempt the question I listed above I get a completely wrong answer and don't know where I went wrong, so I'm assuming I must be using a wrong origin? Anyways, thanks to anyone who can help.

  • tjdominic
    tjdominic about 9 years
    How come the original vertex became (84,0)? Isn't it suppose to be (84,-24)? Also, the answer I should be getting (For the left tower) is y = 1/294(x-84)^2 - 24.
  • rubik
    rubik about 9 years
    @Dan: That's correct, as long as you put the origin right on the tower (that is, where in the image you see $(0, 24)$). Instead, as you can see from the image, for the example I put it below the tower, at the same height as the lowest point of the cable (i.e. the vertex). That's why in my example $y_v = 0$.
  • tjdominic
    tjdominic about 9 years
    Oh, makes sense. Thanks for the help, you were very detailed and I appreciate that.
  • rubik
    rubik about 9 years
    I am glad I was of help! A tip for your next questions, if you will post again: try to learn the bare minimum of LaTeX, to typeset your equations. That will improve the readability a lot. You can start from here: meta.math.stackexchange.com/questions/5020/…
  • rubik
    rubik about 9 years
    Welcome to Math.SE! I can say that your first post is much better than my first one! I didn't even know how to typeset math with LaTeX! All I can say is, keep posting good content and your reputation will go up for sure. You'll enjoy your time here as well.