Is (A ∩ B) ∪ C = A ∩ (B ∪ C)?
At a glance
- 1. Check the law
The proposed identity is not a distributive law; expand the right-hand side using intersection over union.
- 2. Compare membership
An element of the left side can come from all of C, while the right side includes only elements of C that are also in A.
- 3. Test a counterexample
Choose an element in C but outside A; it belongs to the left side and not the right.
- 4. Find the equality condition
The two sides are equal exactly when every element of C is also in A.
The identity does not hold for all sets. The issue is that the left-hand side includes every element of , whereas the right-hand side includes only elements of that also belong to .
The standard distributive law is . Comparing that law with the proposed expression gives both a quick way to see the mismatch and a precise condition under which the proposed equality does hold.
The correct distributive law
Intersection distributes over union as follows:
The term involving is , not all of . An element must be in as well as in to be included in this part of the right-hand side.
By contrast, the proposed left-hand side is . It includes and then adds every element of , including elements outside .
A counterexample
Take
First calculate the left-hand side:
Now calculate the right-hand side:
Since , the identity is false in general. The element makes the difference: it belongs to , so it belongs to the left-hand side, but it does not belong to , so it is excluded from the right-hand side.
Compare the two sides element by element
For any element ,
The first condition allows any . The second allows an element from only if it is also in . Therefore, every element on the right is on the left, but the left can have extra elements.
In set notation, this inclusion is
Exactly when are the sets equal?
For fixed sets , , and , the proposed equality holds exactly when .
If , then . The correct distributive law gives
which is the proposed equality.
Conversely, suppose the two sides are equal. Any belongs to , so it must belong to the equal set . In particular, it belongs to . Since this holds for every , we have .
This condition includes the special case , but it is not necessary for to have any particular relation to or .
Common mistakes
- Distributing over only one term. The expression distributes to ; the intersection with applies to both parts of the union.
- Treating union as if it adds a condition. In , membership in is enough to put an element in the result. It does not also have to be in .
- Checking only one choice of sets. Some choices, such as , make the proposed equality true. A single successful example does not establish an identity for all sets; a counterexample disproves it.
When checking a proposed set identity, translate membership into logical “and” and “or” statements. This makes it easier to see which conditions apply to each part and to construct a counterexample if one side admits an element the other excludes.
Spotted an error? Send a correction. Read how we write and check articles in our editorial policy.