How Do You Set Limits for a Triple Integral Over a Parabolic Cylinder?
At a glance
- 1. Write the surface equation
Identify the parabolic cross-section and the direction in which it extends.
- 2. List every boundary
A cylinder alone does not enclose a finite solid; include the other surfaces or planes.
- 3. Choose an integration order
Project the solid onto a coordinate plane and express each bound in terms of the preceding variables.
- 4. Check the region
Test the bounds against the inequalities and compare the limits with the solid's cross-sections.
A parabolic cylinder is a surface, not a complete bounded solid. Its equation describes a parabola in one coordinate plane that extends unchanged along a third direction. To set up a triple integral, you also need the other boundaries of the solid—such as planes, another cylinder, or coordinate planes.
Here is the standard approach, with a worked example for a cylinder extending parallel to the -axis.
Write the cylinder as an inequality
A common parabolic cylinder is
where . The equation is independent of , so the surface extends in the -direction. Its cross-section in the -plane is a parabola opening toward positive .
If the solid is on the inside, or concave, side of the cylinder, the corresponding inequality is
That inequality gives only one boundary. You still need something to stop the region in the -direction, such as , and lower and upper surfaces in the -direction, such as and .
The axis and orientation may differ. For example, describes a cylinder extending parallel to the -axis but with a parabola opening toward positive . A surface involving instead may extend along a different coordinate direction. Read the equation before assigning limits.
Choose an order from the region
Each integration order describes the same solid using a different sequence of bounds. A useful way to find limits is to project the solid onto a coordinate plane, then describe the variable being integrated first as lying between its lower and upper surfaces.
For a solid bounded by , , and horizontal planes and , with and , the region is
The inequality also gives the full range of :
Thus, for the order , a triple integral of a function is
Alternatively, solve the cylinder inequality for . At each fixed between and , ranges from to . The order gives
Both integrals cover the same solid. The better order is usually the one that makes the bounds and the integration simpler.
Worked example
Take the solid bounded by , , , and , on the side . Here , , , and .
For , the parabola and plane meet where , so . At each fixed , runs from the cylinder to the plane, and runs from 0 to 3:
For , runs from 0 to 4; at each fixed , runs between the two branches of the parabola:
As a check, set to calculate the volume. Using the second order,
The result is consistent with the cross-sectional area: at height , the -region has area , and its height is 3, giving volume 64.
Common mistakes
- Using the surface as if it were the whole solid. The equation gives a boundary, not finite upper and lower limits in every direction. State the additional surfaces that enclose the region.
- Using only one branch of the parabola. When the solid includes both sides of the axis, the -limits are negative and positive: to .
- Mixing up a surface equation and an inequality. The equation identifies the boundary; decide which side belongs to the solid from the problem’s description or a sketch.
- Assuming all orders have the same-looking bounds. Changing the order can make a bound variable-dependent or require splitting the region into pieces. Re-derive the bounds for each order rather than merely rearranging them.
- Leaving out the cylinder’s direction. A parabolic cylinder is constant along one direction. Determine which variable is absent from its equation before deciding how that coordinate is bounded.
If a problem gives only the words “parabolic cylinder” and no other boundary information, its triple-integral limits cannot be determined uniquely. Use the equation and all the bounding surfaces to specify the solid first.
References
- Calculus: Early Transcendentals — James Stewart
Spotted an error? Send a correction. Read how we write and check articles in our editorial policy.