Is there a more gender-neutral and specific term for "Underclassman"?

1,419

Solution 1

Referring to years verbosely makes sense to me.

First-years and sophomores

First and second years

Or if you want a different meaning

First through third years

Solution 2

The phrases "lower-division students" and "upper-division students" are often used to refer to students in the first two years or the last two years (respectively) of a four-year degree. See, for example, this page from U. Texas Austin:

Undergraduate students are classified as freshmen, sophomores, juniors, or seniors, based on the number of semester credit hours passed and transferred, regardless of the hours’ applicability toward a degree. ... Freshmen and sophomores are referred to as lower-division students; juniors and seniors, as upper-division students.

See also this page and this page from Cal State classifying transfer students in this way. This dichotomy is also (and perhaps more frequently) applied to courses, for examples, see UCLA and U. Washington.

Solution 3

I think Yales' terminology is appropriate, though I find it may be more prudent to refer to the program being attempted (undergraduate, graduate, master's, doctoral, post-doctoral, etc) and just append First-Year; is it important to dictate which year they are in aside from the first?

If more specificity is truly needed, Last(Final?)-Year may also be applied in that way, or 'Last-Year Graduate Student.' If in the middle years, state the year as suggested. That seems more than appropriate.

First/Last go together, as opposed to Initial/Final, so First/Last would be at least consistent in its lexicon.

Such as a First-Year Undergraduate being a literal first of the first year.

A First-Year Graduate student being the first year of the graduate program. Etc.

My own criticism of my suggestion is that it may not translate into other academic systems cleanly if their progression structure is different. I can only speak for the American way.

I cannot yet comment so I apologize for responding to the other answer and if inappropriate can be edited out by whomever. In regards to 'themself', it does give me a bit of trouble in syntax. Despite being in both communities it is relevant (linguistics and LGBT), it feels wrong to say out loud. In my own writing and having to reference, speak with and about gender-neutral individuals, 'themselves' is read just as well and can be the same as 'themself' depending on the syntax of the sentence. "They completed the task themselves." as long as the article is defined already, it sounds appropriate. If it isn't, it will sound, again, a bit strange. "Ash completed the task alone." resolves the issue completely, and avoids repetitive pronoun usage.

This is a failure of English with the lack of a third person singular neuter. Many other languages have it. Apologies again for the digression, but it may still be valuable in gender-neutral academic writing. I would appreciate any comments or perpsective on this.

Share:
1,419

Related videos on Youtube

mdiscenza
Author by

mdiscenza

Data Scientist/Data Engineer at RUN Ads

Updated on August 01, 2022

Comments

  • mdiscenza
    mdiscenza over 1 year

    Yale has changed their language, but I don't see a clear alternative here.

    At this point, I think referring to students by their specific class years ( "First-Years and Sophomores" vs. "Juniors and Seniors") is the best alternative for now, particularly because of the ambiguity around what class years the terms "underclassman" and "upperclassman" really refer to.

    • Solar Mike
      Solar Mike about 3 years
      Surely it should be “underclassperson” & “upperclassperson”?
    • Noah Snyder
      Noah Snyder about 3 years
      This is nitpicky, but the distinction at Yale is first-years vs. everyone else (since that's how living arrangements work) not 1st/2nd vs. 3rd/4th. That is "upperclassmen" always includes sophomores at Yale. It's only ambiguous if you think the term is meaningful outside of its technical usage at specific universities.
    • Jon Custer
      Jon Custer about 3 years
      I propose Frophs...
    • knzhou
      knzhou about 3 years
      I've seen "frosh and sophs", even in official communications.
    • gerrit
      gerrit about 3 years
      By underclass I would think of Lumpenproletariat. I've never seen the phrase used to mean students of a certain year.
  • Azor Ahai -him-
    Azor Ahai -him- about 3 years
    What system? I'm find with "themself."
  • Buffy
    Buffy about 3 years
    @AzorAhai--hehim, it is marked as misspelled in the editor here.
  • Azor Ahai -him-
    Azor Ahai -him- about 3 years
    Haha, well I wouldn't take SE as an expert on gendered language ...
  • Azor Ahai -him-
    Azor Ahai -him- about 3 years
    Funny, I'm a linguist too and have naturally produced "themself" even though I'm not super deep into LGBT culture.
  • Daniel Hatton
    Daniel Hatton about 3 years
    @AzorAhai--hehim I thought the editor on here just used the browser's spell-checker on client-side...?
  • Azor Ahai -him-
    Azor Ahai -him- about 3 years
    @Daniel I have no idea.
  • Rachel R
    Rachel R about 3 years
    I find it to be more of a kneejerk reaction to a highly ingrained grammatical rule from many years of writing without consideration to LGBT variety. It is just a pitfall of English as it is imo. It may change and I hope it does.