Applied vs Pure Math for an Engineering Student

1,693

Believe it or not, following the "pure" track might help you out more.

I used to have an "applied concentration" to my math major, which meant I had to take mathematical modeling classes, graph theory, operations research I & II, etc. on top of my core classes. When I decided to go the PhD route (applied), my advisor recommended I drop the applied concentration in favor of the pure, reason being that the pure classes will give me more breadth and better preparation for grad school.

Ultimately, this meant that I had to take abstract algebra, adv. Calc I & II (also known as elem. real analysis), a proof writing class, etc. I did end up taking the modeling class as an elective.

From the point of view of my advisor (who is on the grad. Admissions committee at my school) these aforementioned classes show capacity and mathematical maturity to a greater extent than the applied courses, which is what departments would like to see when considering your PhD application. Plus, they give you a foundation to build upon once in grad school.

So, I'd say take the pure classes and cherry pick (smartly) the applied ones as electives. This will ensure you're more prepared for the rigor you'll encounter wherever you decide to go.

Best of luck!

Share:
1,693

Related videos on Youtube

Reda3019
Author by

Reda3019

Updated on August 16, 2022

Comments

  • Reda3019
    Reda3019 about 1 year

    I'm an electrical engineering student specializing in communications. I decided 1 year into my undergraduate studies to pursue a degree in mathematics alongside my engineering degree. I plan on going to engineering research (PhD) and possibly working in the industry after a while. I know that applied math would make more sense but I'm asking whether it would make that much of a difference if I went with Pure instead.

    One reason I'm asking this is that Pure Math has more "beautiful" courses that made me decide on math in the first place. Moreover, the two degrees aren't that different in terms of required courses. Finally, Applied would take me more time to complete because my math course choices in that my 2nd year were oriented towards Pure. I'm completely willing to spend that extra time pursuing applied. I'm just wondering wether it would make a difference.

    • jakebeal
      jakebeal about 7 years
      Hi, and welcome to Academia.SE! Both of the possible paths that you are considering are reasonable possibilities, but which is best for you depends on details of you and your circumstances that random strangers on the internet cannot know well enough to help.
    • Frames Catherine White
      Frames Catherine White about 7 years
      Having done Pure math, and E/E Engineering with a Comms focus; Pure math is real useful, if that is where Complex Analysis is placed (If could be in applied too i guess). Understanding Laurent Series makes finding Fourier Series easier and more intuitive. More generally though, in my PhD I have used just about everything from my 2 undergrad degrees (and 3 majors). It is all useful; That one Applied Math unit I took? Turns out super useful cos I could reframe a decoding problem as a convex optimization problem. Pure Topology? Turns out great work is happening in a related area using manifolds
    • robert bristow-johnson
      robert bristow-johnson about 7 years
      do you plan to continue anything in the direction of your EE emphasis (which is Communications Systems)? will Signal Processing (DSP) be part of that? if so, you should take courses in 1. Probability, Random Variables, and Random Processes; 2. Complex Variables; 3. Numerical Methods and Approximation Theory; 4. Metric Spaces and Functional Analysis. those courses will assist you with a signal processing emphasis. maybe take a semester of Real Analysis. you should already have enough in Differential Equations, Linear System Theory, and in Fourier analysis.